Home
Archives
Links/Resources
Contact Us
canpalnet-ottawa.org   

 

Canadian MPs form Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism

The members of this committee are Canada's top defenders of Israeli crimes. The FAQ on the CPCCA website clearly indicate that this committee conflates anti-Semitism and anti-Zionimism.  Their concern is not anti-semitism but silencing critics of Israel.  Bernie Farber, the CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress and a supporter of the CPCCA has admitted that anti-semitism is not a problem in Canada:

"We have come to a point in the 21st century where at least in the halls of government, and I think very much in the mainstream of Canadian life, we are viewed as part and parcel of Canadian polity."

Rabbi Dow Marmer expresses similar sentiments in this Canadian Jewish News article entitled "We've never had it so good".



November 10, 2010


Murray Dobbin - Harper on Israel: Is the Prime Minister mentally sound?


Harper has taken the position of being Israel's defender no matter what -- in other words, this commitment comes before his duty as prime minister, before his duty to represent Canada's interests abroad, before his role of elected representative. Harper is a defender of Israel no matter the consequences for Canada....

Harper's speech was given to the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism an international pro-Zionist group whose sole task is to redefine anti-Semitism to mean virtually any criticism of Israel.


November 4, 2010

Rabble.ca - Anti-Semitism and free speech: In Parliament this weekend

The hoax, attempted by the proponents of the "new anti-Semitism," pretends that the "new anti-Semitism" is the same as the "old anti-Semitism."

Apply the same logic to Canada. Who would label as "hate" and "bigotry" -- as "new anti-Canadianism" -- those who seriously question the colonial origins of our political structures and government practices, or the bigoted attitudes held by Canadians at different times?

If we went down this path we would have to denounce the expression, and demand the suppression, of those who wished to publicly discuss the government of Canada's oppression of aboriginal people, the imprisonment of Canadians of Japanese origin during the second world war, and the exclusion of Jewish refugees before the war.


CPNO - Highlights of statements of participants at the CPCCA Hearings


The accusation that Canadian University campuses are a hotbed of anti-Semitism was refuted at the CPCCA hearings by representatives of major universities.  University administrators defended freedom of expression even if ideas expressed were offensive to some.

The police chiefs who testified at the hearings did not see anti-Semitism as a problem in their communities and made the distinction between offensive language and criminal acts.


February 21, 2010

Torstar - Siddiqui: Parliamentary panel muzzles debate on Israel

The 19-member all-party Parliamentary Coalition to Combat anti-Semitism – not a formal committee – has been hearing mostly from those who would say what it wants to hear: that most if not all criticism of Israel might equal anti-Semitism and that anti-Semitism is rampant, especially on university campuses.

February 15, 2010

Tainted by partisanship, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat anti-Semitism loses Bloc Quebecois members


The Bloc Quebecois announced Monday that it had decided to resign from the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism (CPCCA) because of the biased and partisan nature of the coalition. Bloc MP Luc Desnoyers, one of the two Bloc members formerly presiding on the Steering Committee, confirmed that the party's decision reflected its unease in the face of "the inequality of opinions presented before the Coalition," and "the refusal of the Steering Committee to hear groups with opposing viewpoints."

February 9, 2010

Joanne Naiman - The Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism: What it means for Canadians

It's not hard to see that if one accepts Cotler's premise that Israel is what he calls “the collective Jew,” then any criticism of the State of Israel is, de facto , anti-Semitic. ....

Without a doubt, the main purpose of this redefinition of antisemitism is to create a serious chill on university campuses and in the media. Teachers will be afraid to discuss Israeli policies in their classrooms, while Israeli Apartheid Weeks will be prohibited by administrations on campuses across the country for fear of being charged with inciting hate crimes. Likewise, articles critical of Israeli government policies or actions (as rare as they are) will likely disappear from the print and electronic media. It is possible that websites could be shut down. Organizations critical of Israel will be unable to rent public venues for meetings. Already, I've heard that some Palestinian support groups fear they may be charged under hate laws. In other words, what we will be seeing—in fact are already seeing—is a new form of McCarthyism.

January 6, 2010

Rabble.ca - Confusing politics and prejudice in the fight against anti-semitism

Since legislation exists to deal with racism and hate in Canada, one can reasonably ask why some feel that there is need for new laws. The answer is the so-called "new anti-semitism" that both of the CPCCA's ex-officio members, former Liberal Justice Minister Irwin Cotler and current Conservative Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, have been condemning from Israeli and other podia for the past few years....

During the hearings, some leading questions were posed by members of the CPCCA to university representatives. These suggest that at least some members have already espoused a particular view instead of being open, inclusive and welcoming to other perspectives, and that their aim is to primarily dictate the terms of debate. If this is true, then the whole exercise will be seen as an attempt to stifle open debate and outlaw opinions that do not concur with the views of Cotler and Kenney. This will no doubt create distrust and division within our multicultural society and further exacerbate frustration.

 

December 2009

Canadian Jewish Congress Submission to the CPCCA

Read the dangerous recommendations made to the CPCCA by the Canadian Jewish Congress starting on page 10 of this document. There are 17 recommendations dealing with everything from setting up special committees, jobs and surveys to combat anti-Semitism (all with taxpayer dollars) to developping guidelines to limit freedom of speech on campuses and even to offering training (propagandizing) to police and judges!!! This is clearly a detailed formula to criminalize criticism of Israel in Canada.

Canadians are free to criticize their own government and elected officials. Why should they not be free to criticize the policies of the Israeli government? Why should anti-Semitism receive special attention over all other types of racism. These are a few of the points made in the two pieces below both written by Jews.

 

Submissions opposing the CPCCA objectives

Letter by Bruce Katz, Montreal

I take exception to the idea that Zionism and Judaism are one and the same so that consequently to criticize Zionism is to be anti-Semitic. This is sophistry of the worst kind. If you believe this, then you must necessarily condemn great Jewish thinkers such as Albert Einstein and Martin Buber as being anti-Semitic since they were both critical of Zionism. Indeed, the list of prominent Jewish intellectuals who have been critical of the nature of Zionism is as long as one’s arm. Are they therefore anti-Semitic? Are the Rabbis for Human Rights in Israel also anti-Semitic because they have criticized their own government and defend Palestinian human rights?

Combating Anti-Semitism or Shielding Israel? Joanne Naiman, Vancouver

Your committee wants to develop meaningful suggestions to combat anti-Semitism. I have tried to argue that what the Jewish community refers to as anti-Semitism is almost always either a critique of the abhorrent and illegal policies of the State of Israel, or is a prejudice against Jews that has arisen from opposition to the policies of the only country in the world that considers itself a Jewish state. The global criticism of South Africa ended when Apartheid ended. Thus, in its final report the CPCCA could do no better than to advocate for major changes to current Israeli government policies.

Submission of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association to the CPCCA

While universities and policy makers should be alive to the impact these debates can have on minorities,
their response should not include censorship or official sanction. University administrations should not be
in the business of censoring academics, students or individuals because they have expressed their point of
view in a manner that others view as one-sided, disrespectful, or misguided. The line between appropriate
and inappropriate criticism is simply too vague, and the threat to freedom of expression too great, to
employ censorship or official sanction in such situations. (page 5 of submission)

 

Articles in the Media

Weinstein - Canadian campuses NOT hotbeds of antisemitism

The CPCCA, composed of MPs from all the parties except the Greens, has a sinister plan for Canadians: label and criminalize as anti-Semites those who criticize Israel and Zionism. These activists and critics fall into what the CPCCA defines as the "new antisemitism" .

The suggested remedy proposed by the CPCCA's co-founders, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler and Conservative MP Jason Kenney, is to prime "the Government of Canada for a response" against such critics.

Tolerance.ca - Canadian Jews and Free Speech

[This article summarizes many of the recent attempts by the Zionist lobby in Canada to suppress criticism of Israel.]

We now seem to have a strain of repressive, anti-civil libertarianism in our Jewish community. I cannot stress too much how this flies in the face of our Canadian tradition of free speech and undermines it.... Jewish youth are especially sensitive to free speech issues and they may come to the understanding that the defence of Israel within Canada has become intimately related to the suppression of free expression. Such a conclusion would be harmful to Israel and hurtful to Canada’s Jewish community.

The Tyee - Criticizing Israel Isn't Antisemitism
But a new coalition of MPs seems to say the two are one and the same.

The coalition formally invited written submissions and stated that "Based on these submissions, the committee will invite witnesses to testify at a series of public hearings." There was virtually no general publicity about the inquiry, but when word did get out, numerous submissions were made arguing against the Coalition's concept of a "new anti-Semitism." Yet not a single organization or individual known for criticism of Israel has been scheduled to make a presentation to the inquiry (it is holding eight meetings on Parliament Hill from Nov. 2 to Dec. 8).

Torstar - Harper's extremism is showing

The tone set by the Harper government seems to be encouraging an attack on open debate about Israel on Canadian campuses. An ad-hoc group of parliamentarians, including Conservatives, Liberals and New Democrats, has set itself up as an "inquiry" into what it considers a new anti-Semitism, with a particular focus on campuses. They open hearings in Ottawa this week.




Your Comments

canpalnet-ottawa.org