By STEPHEN HUI
Published: Monday, February 21, 2005
Page 1 of 2
TORONTO (CUP) - While York University and its faculty union won't discuss the status of his complaint, a professor demanding $10 million in damages and an apology from the university for alleged defamation says he's confident he'll win if it goes to arbitration.
Social science professor David Noble maintains the university damaged his reputation, discriminated against him, and violated his academic freedom when it issued a press release Nov. 19, 2004, condemning material he distributed at a campus event a day earlier as "targeting Jewish members of the York community."
"By assassinating my character, I assume they hoped to silence me," said Noble, who is Jewish.
The York University Faculty Association agrees with the professor and is formally supporting his grievance, which also calls for the university to send out a second press release acknowledging the first one was in error and a breach of the union's contract with the administration.
The press release appeared to bring the university and its fundraising organization, the York University Foundation, together with student groups Hillel and Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights to denounce the material, of which Noble distributed several copies at an SPHR film night.
But the pro-Palestinian group issued its own statement disowning its participation in the university's release several days later.
Noble's two-page document suggested the university's recent decisions to crack down on pro-Palestinian activists and bring the Toronto Argonauts' football stadium on campus may have been influenced by the political views and business interests of some of the foundation's board members.
The document linked several board members to Israeli fundraising organizations, alleging the foundation is "biased by the presence and influence of staunch pro-Israel lobbyists, activists, and fundraising agencies."
"It identifies the directors of the York University Foundation and some of the organizations to which they are affiliated, and the identification of various organizations that raise money for and lobby for Israel," Noble said. Continued...
Page 2 of 2
"That's it," the professor added. "So, there's absolutely zero ethnic identification."
Within 24 hours of the document's distribution on campus, the administration issued its press release. The next day, there was an article in the Globe and Mail; coverage in the Toronto Star followed the day after.
In the release, the president of the university, Lorna Marsden, referred to the document as "highly offensive material, which singles out certain members of the York community on the basis of their ethnicity and alleged political views."
According to Noble, despite the union's insistence it be taken down, the release is still available on the university's website.
"To be clear, the university did not allege anti-Semitism nor did we name the individual," said Nancy White, York's director of media relations. "However, it is our view that this kind of material diminishes our sense of community in a university environment."
White disputed the allegations in Noble's document.
"We don't take positions on foreign policy matters," she said.
In SPHR's statement Nov. 24, the group claimed the administration asked two of its spokespersons to condemn material they hadn't seen. Noble's document was appended to that statement, which slammed "continuing and dangerous attempts to conflate opposition to Zionism and Israeli policies with unqualified anti-Semitism."
Furat Al Yassin, who was quoted as SPHR president in the university's release, was out of the country and unavailable for comment, according to Shadi Hajjara, the group's Toronto regional co-ordinator, who said he supports Noble's $10-million grievance.
Asked what stage the grievance was in, the faculty union's communications officer, Jay Rahn, said, "Nothing's changed," but wouldn't comment any further.
White also refused to comment on the grievance, saying it's a personnel issue.
Fair Use Notice
The above may be copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.